[SQL2000] Transactional replication and database filegroups

Hello everybory
Some general question about Transactionnal Replication features on SQL 2000
In case of using Trans. Repl. to duplicate a whole database to another SQL
2000 server, does the Transactionnal Replication preserve database's
filegroup (i.e. tables/indexes distributed accross different files on disk ) ?
No info found about it in the BOL or KB.
I have made some testings and even when the destination database is created
with multiple filegroups before transactionnal replicatiion activated, all
the tables fall in the PRIMARY filegroupn whatever their initial filegroup in
the source database.
Any option or hints to do this ?
Thank in advance
Jb,
you could script out the creation of filegroups and creation of objects onto
particular filegroups. On the publication properties, this script could be
made to run before the snapshot is applied. On the article properties,
naming conflicts section, you can select to leave the table intact if it
already exists. This bypasses the inbuilt snapshot schema generation.
HTH,
Paul Ibison
"Jb Vernejoux" <JbVernejoux@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:AB06D8F0-1CB8-4E44-AC66-FEBC5311CD8C@.microsoft.com...
> Hello everybory
> Some general question about Transactionnal Replication features on SQL
2000
> In case of using Trans. Repl. to duplicate a whole database to another SQL
> 2000 server, does the Transactionnal Replication preserve database's
> filegroup (i.e. tables/indexes distributed accross different files on
disk ) ?
> No info found about it in the BOL or KB.
> I have made some testings and even when the destination database is
created
> with multiple filegroups before transactionnal replicatiion activated, all
> the tables fall in the PRIMARY filegroupn whatever their initial filegroup
in
> the source database.
> Any option or hints to do this ?
> Thank in advance
|||use a pre snapshot command that adds the file groups. (Alter database test
add filegroup file_group).
and then add some files to this filegroup
ALTER DATABASE test
ADD FILE(NAME = 'test_FG', FILENAME = 'C:\temp\test_FG_Data.NDF', SIZE = 1,
FILEGROWTH = 10%) TO FILEGROUP [test]
Hilary Cotter
Looking for a book on SQL Server replication?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
"Paul Ibison" <Paul.Ibison@.Pygmalion.Com> wrote in message
news:uuKyWTciEHA.2664@.TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Jb,
> you could script out the creation of filegroups and creation of objects
onto[vbcol=seagreen]
> particular filegroups. On the publication properties, this script could be
> made to run before the snapshot is applied. On the article properties,
> naming conflicts section, you can select to leave the table intact if it
> already exists. This bypasses the inbuilt snapshot schema generation.
> HTH,
> Paul Ibison
> "Jb Vernejoux" <JbVernejoux@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:AB06D8F0-1CB8-4E44-AC66-FEBC5311CD8C@.microsoft.com...
> 2000
SQL[vbcol=seagreen]
> disk ) ?
> created
all[vbcol=seagreen]
filegroup
> in
>
|||ok,
thanks all for your info
Jb VERNEJOUX
"Hilary Cotter" wrote:

> use a pre snapshot command that adds the file groups. (Alter database test
> add filegroup file_group).
> and then add some files to this filegroup
> ALTER DATABASE test
> ADD FILE(NAME = 'test_FG', FILENAME = 'C:\temp\test_FG_Data.NDF', SIZE = 1,
> FILEGROWTH = 10%) TO FILEGROUP [test]
> --
> Hilary Cotter
> Looking for a book on SQL Server replication?
> http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
>
> "Paul Ibison" <Paul.Ibison@.Pygmalion.Com> wrote in message
> news:uuKyWTciEHA.2664@.TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> onto
> SQL
> all
> filegroup
>
>

[SQL2000] permissions to use view based on tables from many databases

Hi
I have two databases: Customers and Operations. In Customers database I have
made a view based on a few tables from both Customers and Operations (left
join - customers without any operations). In the same database (Customers) I
have created a stored procedure based on the view. Finally I'd like to give
to some users permission only to exec the stored procedure.
Have I to add the users to Customers? If yes, please describe me how to
limit the users privileges only to execution the stored procedure (no rights
to open tables or view from Customers).
Regards,
Grzegorz
Ps. I had sent the post on microsoft.public.sqlserver.security, but I had no
answer.By default when you add a user they do not have any permissions to do
anything. So just make sure you don't add them to any of the server or
database roles. Then simply GRANT them execute permission on that sp.
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"Grzegorz Danowski" <gdn__na@.serwerze__poczta.onet.pl> wrote in message
news:dteimk$1b7$1@.inews.gazeta.pl...
> Hi
> I have two databases: Customers and Operations. In Customers database I
> have made a view based on a few tables from both Customers and Operations
> (left join - customers without any operations). In the same database
> (Customers) I have created a stored procedure based on the view. Finally
> I'd like to give to some users permission only to exec the stored
> procedure.
> Have I to add the users to Customers? If yes, please describe me how to
> limit the users privileges only to execution the stored procedure (no
> rights to open tables or view from Customers).
> Regards,
> Grzegorz
> Ps. I had sent the post on microsoft.public.sqlserver.security, but I had
> no answer.|||Well, it works fine in situations when all tables are in the same database,
but it doesn't work when tables are in two databases. If user have no rights
to read source table from other database SQL Server shows error:
"SELECT permission denied on object 'CustomersData', database 'Customers',
owner 'dbo'."
Grzegorz
Uytkownik "Andrew J. Kelly" <sqlmvpnooospam@.shadhawk.com> napisa w
wiadomoci news:%23Iia6cuNGHA.2336@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> By default when you add a user they do not have any permissions to do
> anything. So just make sure you don't add them to any of the server or
> database roles. Then simply GRANT them execute permission on that sp.
> --
> Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP|||Are the objects owned by the same owner in both db's? If so you may have to
specify rights on the other tables. Is Cross database Ownership chaining
turned on?
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=810474
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"Grzegorz Danowski" <gdn__na@.serwerze__poczta.onet.pl> wrote in message
news:dtf589$5h3$1@.inews.gazeta.pl...
> Well, it works fine in situations when all tables are in the same
> database, but it doesn't work when tables are in two databases. If user
> have no rights to read source table from other database SQL Server shows
> error:
> "SELECT permission denied on object 'CustomersData', database 'Customers',
> owner 'dbo'."
> Grzegorz
>
> Uytkownik "Andrew J. Kelly" <sqlmvpnooospam@.shadhawk.com> napisa w
> wiadomoci news:%23Iia6cuNGHA.2336@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>|||Thanks, it works.
Grzegorz
Uytkownik "Andrew J. Kelly" <sqlmvpnooospam@.shadhawk.com> napisa w
wiadomoci news:O07NN2uNGHA.2064@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Are the objects owned by the same owner in both db's? If so you may have
> to specify rights on the other tables. Is Cross database Ownership
> chaining turned on?
> http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=810474
> --
> Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
>
> "Grzegorz Danowski" <gdn__na@.serwerze__poczta.onet.pl> wrote in message
> news:dtf589$5h3$1@.inews.gazeta.pl...
>|||It is a in SQL that permission is check on the first called element i.e.
in case of stored procedure the there's a check made if the user has
the right to execute a procedure. Thus it's possiblie to allow a user to
execure a procedure and e.g. display a subset of data without allowing
to read tables content. Up to sp3 it was valid for the whole server.
From sp3 you've got to set cross-databse chaining explicitly.
Grzegorz Danowski wrote:
> Hi
> I have two databases: Customers and Operations. In Customers database I
> have made a view based on a few tables from both Customers and
> Operations (left join - customers without any operations). In the same
> database (Customers) I have created a stored procedure based on the
> view. Finally I'd like to give to some users permission only to exec the
> stored procedure.
> Have I to add the users to Customers? If yes, please describe me how to
> limit the users privileges only to execution the stored procedure (no
> rights to open tables or view from Customers).
> Regards,
> Grzegorz
> Ps. I had sent the post on microsoft.public.sqlserver.security, but I
> had no answer.

[SQL2000] permissions to use view based on tables from many databases

Hi

I have two databases: Customers and Operations. In Customers database I have
made a view based on a few tables from both Customers and Operations (left
join - customers without any operations). In the same database (Customers) I
have created a stored procedure based on the view. Finally I'd like to give
to some users permission only to exec the stored procedure.

Have I to add the users to Customers? If yes, please describe me how to
limit the users privileges only to execution the stored procedure (no rights
to open tables or view from Customers).

Regards,
Grzegorz

Ps. I had sent the post on microsoft.public.sqlserver.security, but I had no
answer.By default when you add a user they do not have any permissions to do
anything. So just make sure you don't add them to any of the server or
database roles. Then simply GRANT them execute permission on that sp.

--
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP

"Grzegorz Danowski" <gdn__na@.serwerze__poczta.onet.pl> wrote in message
news:dteimk$1b7$1@.inews.gazeta.pl...
> Hi
> I have two databases: Customers and Operations. In Customers database I
> have made a view based on a few tables from both Customers and Operations
> (left join - customers without any operations). In the same database
> (Customers) I have created a stored procedure based on the view. Finally
> I'd like to give to some users permission only to exec the stored
> procedure.
> Have I to add the users to Customers? If yes, please describe me how to
> limit the users privileges only to execution the stored procedure (no
> rights to open tables or view from Customers).
> Regards,
> Grzegorz
> Ps. I had sent the post on microsoft.public.sqlserver.security, but I had
> no answer.|||Well, it works fine in situations when all tables are in the same database,
but it doesn't work when tables are in two databases. If user have no rights
to read source table from other database SQL Server shows error:
"SELECT permission denied on object 'CustomersData', database 'Customers',
owner 'dbo'."

Grzegorz

Uytkownik "Andrew J. Kelly" <sqlmvpnooospam@.shadhawk.com> napisa w
wiadomoci news:%23Iia6cuNGHA.2336@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> By default when you add a user they do not have any permissions to do
> anything. So just make sure you don't add them to any of the server or
> database roles. Then simply GRANT them execute permission on that sp.
> --
> Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP|||Are the objects owned by the same owner in both db's? If so you may have to
specify rights on the other tables. Is Cross database Ownership chaining
turned on?

http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=810474

--
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP

"Grzegorz Danowski" <gdn__na@.serwerze__poczta.onet.pl> wrote in message
news:dtf589$5h3$1@.inews.gazeta.pl...
> Well, it works fine in situations when all tables are in the same
> database, but it doesn't work when tables are in two databases. If user
> have no rights to read source table from other database SQL Server shows
> error:
> "SELECT permission denied on object 'CustomersData', database 'Customers',
> owner 'dbo'."
> Grzegorz
>
> Uytkownik "Andrew J. Kelly" <sqlmvpnooospam@.shadhawk.com> napisa w
> wiadomoci news:%23Iia6cuNGHA.2336@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>> By default when you add a user they do not have any permissions to do
>> anything. So just make sure you don't add them to any of the server or
>> database roles. Then simply GRANT them execute permission on that sp.
>>
>> --
>> Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP|||Thanks, it works.
Grzegorz

Uytkownik "Andrew J. Kelly" <sqlmvpnooospam@.shadhawk.com> napisa w
wiadomoci news:O07NN2uNGHA.2064@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Are the objects owned by the same owner in both db's? If so you may have
> to specify rights on the other tables. Is Cross database Ownership
> chaining turned on?
> http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=810474
> --
> Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
>
> "Grzegorz Danowski" <gdn__na@.serwerze__poczta.onet.pl> wrote in message
> news:dtf589$5h3$1@.inews.gazeta.pl...
>> Well, it works fine in situations when all tables are in the same
>> database, but it doesn't work when tables are in two databases. If user
>> have no rights to read source table from other database SQL Server shows
>> error:
>> "SELECT permission denied on object 'CustomersData', database
>> 'Customers', owner 'dbo'."
>>
>> Grzegorz
>>
>>
>> Uytkownik "Andrew J. Kelly" <sqlmvpnooospam@.shadhawk.com> napisa w
>> wiadomoci news:%23Iia6cuNGHA.2336@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>>> By default when you add a user they do not have any permissions to do
>>> anything. So just make sure you don't add them to any of the server or
>>> database roles. Then simply GRANT them execute permission on that sp.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
>>|||It is a in SQL that permission is check on the first called element i.e.
in case of stored procedure the there's a check made if the user has
the right to execute a procedure. Thus it's possiblie to allow a user to
execure a procedure and e.g. display a subset of data without allowing
to read tables content. Up to sp3 it was valid for the whole server.
From sp3 you've got to set cross-databse chaining explicitly.

Grzegorz Danowski wrote:
> Hi
> I have two databases: Customers and Operations. In Customers database I
> have made a view based on a few tables from both Customers and
> Operations (left join - customers without any operations). In the same
> database (Customers) I have created a stored procedure based on the
> view. Finally I'd like to give to some users permission only to exec the
> stored procedure.
> Have I to add the users to Customers? If yes, please describe me how to
> limit the users privileges only to execution the stored procedure (no
> rights to open tables or view from Customers).
> Regards,
> Grzegorz
> Ps. I had sent the post on microsoft.public.sqlserver.security, but I
> had no answer.

[Sql2000] how to limit table size

hi all,
I checked out in google groups but was not able to find
the answer...
is it possible to limit size table in sql server?
how can I do it?

TIAilkaos wrote:

Quote:

Originally Posted by

hi all,
I checked out in google groups but was not able to find
the answer...
is it possible to limit size table in sql server?
how can I do it?
>
TIA

Add the table to some filegroup and then fix the total size of files in
that filegroup:

CREATE TABLE tbl
(... ) ON filegroup_xyz;

Take a look at ALTER DATABASE ... ADD FILEGROUP / FILE for more
details.

Alternatively, you could use constraints to limit the maximum number of
*rows* in a table (not necessarily comparable with the size of the
table in storage). The details of how to do this would depend on the
nature of the table and keys. For example:

/* Maximum 10,000 rows */
ALTER TABLE tbl ADD foo INT NOT NULL
CONSTRAINT ak_tbl_foo UNIQUE,
CONSTRAINT ck_tbl_foo CHECK (foo BETWEEN 1 AND 10000);

--
David Portas, SQL Server MVP

Whenever possible please post enough code to reproduce your problem.
Including CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements usually helps.
State what version of SQL Server you are using and specify the content
of any error messages.

SQL Server Books Online:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/library/...US,SQL.90).aspx
--|||

Quote:

Originally Posted by

>"David Portas" <REMOVE_BEFORE_REPLYING_dportas@.acm.org>

thanks a lot for you (very quick!) answer.

[SQL2000] dateadd (millisecond) problem

select dateadd(millisecond,-1,convert(datetime,'20080101 0: 0: 0',112))
why isn't it 20061231 23:59:59.999 ?
--
SoftMedia Technology Co., Ltd.
Website: http://www.softmedia.hk Tel: (852)2743 4228
* TryEasy Accounting/POS/Trading/ERP solutionsThere is a rounding issue associated with millisecond values. Please take a
look at this link for more details:
http://www.sql-server-performance.com/forum/topic.asp?ARCHIVE=true&TOPIC_ID=908
Cheers,
Paul Ibison SQL Server MVP, www.replicationanswers.com|||"Man-wai Chang" <info@.softmedia.hk> wrote in message
news:uvGIDscxGHA.4444@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> select dateadd(millisecond,-1,convert(datetime,'20080101 0: 0: 0',112))
> why isn't it 20061231 23:59:59.999 ?
Please have a look in BOL at the information about the datetime datatype.
You are assuming that the datatype is accurate to 1 ms - this is not a valid
assumption. You should also review the information in the following link
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/info_datetime.asp

[SQL2000] dateadd (millisecond) problem

select dateadd(millisecond,-1,convert(datetime,'20080101 0: 0: 0',112))
why isn't it 20061231 23:59:59.999 ?
SoftMedia Technology Co., Ltd.
Website: http://www.softmedia.hk Tel: (852)2743 4228
* TryEasy Accounting/POS/Trading/ERP solutionsThere is a rounding issue associated with millisecond values. Please take a
look at this link for more details:
http://www.sql-server-performance.c...tionanswers.com|||"Man-wai Chang" <info@.softmedia.hk> wrote in message
news:uvGIDscxGHA.4444@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> select dateadd(millisecond,-1,convert(datetime,'20080101 0: 0: 0',112))
> why isn't it 20061231 23:59:59.999 ?
Please have a look in BOL at the information about the datetime datatype.
You are assuming that the datatype is accurate to 1 ms - this is not a valid
assumption. You should also review the information in the following link
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/info_datetime.asp

[Q] cpu is full.. 100%

os : win2000
sql : sql2000 enterprise
table name : job
I created fulltext catalog
table is job column name : title
full population is every sunday am 5:00
incremental population is every 2hours from 7am to next day 3am
whenever server is running the both population, cpu is full 100%(see the
task manager )
Question : can i reduce the cpu use?
the columns are updated frequently are readcnt of job table
if i remove the readcnt column, the cpu use will reduce?
thanks...
below is the result of sp_spaceused job
name rows reserved data index_size unused
Jobs 259845 468808 KB 214264 KB 28128 KB 226416 KB
column_name type
title varchar(100)
findPrsn tinyint
ageZn varchar
applyRght varchar
emplrId varchar
seq int
readCnt int
sido tinyint
workTyp char
applyDcmnt varchar
findYmd2 smalldatetime
gugun tinyint
finishYmd bit
ymd smalldatetime
particular char
position varchar
logo varchar
endymd smalldatetime
jobtype1 tinyint
jobtype2 tinyint
jobtype3 tinyint
paytype char
pay1 int
pay2 bit
suprise tinyint
ts timestamp
visible bit
createdYmd smalldatetime
parkchangsoon,
The limited duration high CPU usage you are seeing during your scheduled
Incremental Population is expected and normal as there is a lot of internal
work being processed that is not only CPU intensive, but memory and disk i/o
intensive, but only for specific durations. You can reduce the priority of
the MSSearch service via sp_fulltext_service 'resource_usage' <value>, where
<value> is by default set to 3, and set it to 1 (background). However, this
will have the affect of causing the Incremental Population to take much
longer time to complete.
Since you are using SQL Server 2000, I'd highly recommend that you look at
"Change Tracking" and "Updated Index in Background" (see the BOL for more
info on Change Tracking) as this will eliminate the need for your scheduled
Incremental Population and allow your FT Catalog to be updated in near
real-time as the FT-enabled column is updated. This will eliminate the high
cpu usage you are seeing during the scheduled Incremental Population.
Regards,
John
"parkchangsoon" <dev_sr@.albaroot.com> wrote in message
news:#PZ$lvLXEHA.2972@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> os : win2000
> sql : sql2000 enterprise
> table name : job
> I created fulltext catalog
> table is job column name : title
> full population is every sunday am 5:00
> incremental population is every 2hours from 7am to next day 3am
> whenever server is running the both population, cpu is full 100%(see the
> task manager )
> Question : can i reduce the cpu use?
> the columns are updated frequently are readcnt of job table
> if i remove the readcnt column, the cpu use will reduce?
> thanks...
>
> below is the result of sp_spaceused job
> name rows reserved data index_size unused
> ----
> Jobs 259845 468808 KB 214264 KB 28128 KB 226416 KB
> column_name type
> --
> title varchar(100)
> findPrsn tinyint
> ageZn varchar
> applyRght varchar
> emplrId varchar
> seq int
> readCnt int
> sido tinyint
> workTyp char
> applyDcmnt varchar
> findYmd2 smalldatetime
> gugun tinyint
> finishYmd bit
> ymd smalldatetime
> particular char
> position varchar
> logo varchar
> endymd smalldatetime
> jobtype1 tinyint
> jobtype2 tinyint
> jobtype3 tinyint
> paytype char
> pay1 int
> pay2 bit
> suprise tinyint
> ts timestamp
> visible bit
> createdYmd smalldatetime
>

[DBNETLIB][ConnectionOpen (PreLoginHandshake()).]General network error.

Hi,

I have a classic ASP application that has been running on Win2003,IIS6 and SQL2000 for 3 years without a single error.

We've just moved to SQL2005 enterprise and we're getting the following intermittent error.

Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server error '80004005'

[DBNETLIB][ConnectionOpen (PreLoginHandshake()).]General network error. Check your network documentation.

Any ideas where to start?

this is a common connection problem and without details like your current sql server configuration and connection string, we just can write our guesses,

first, if you have not installed latest service pack for sql serer 2005, please install it before trying the following suggestions,

second, you can check if you have enabled remote connections on sql server, to check this setting go to sql server surface area configuration -> surface area configuration for services and connections -> remote connections and enable remote connections by selection "local and remote connections" and using tcp/ip only.

if the previous step did not solve your problem, you can check your connection string, please examine the following connection strings,
for odbc connections:
- Driver={SQL Native Client};Server=myServerAddress;Database=myDataBase;Uid=myUsername;Pwd=myPassword;
- Driver={SQL Native Client};Server=myServerAddress;Database=myDataBase;Trusted_Connection=yes;

for ole db connections
- Provider=SQLNCLI;Server=myServerAddress;Database=myDataBase;Uid=myUsername;Pwd=myPassword;
- Provider=SQLNCLI;Server=myServerAddress;Database=myDataBase;Trusted_Connection=yes;

for .net connections
- Data Source=myServerAddress;Initial Catalog=myDataBase;User Id=myUsername;Password=myPassword;
or
- Server=myServerAddress;Database=myDataBase;User ID=myUsername;Password=myPassword;Trusted_Connection=False;
- Data Source=myServerAddress;Initial Catalog=myDataBase;Integrated Security=SSPI;
or
- Server=myServerAddress;Database=myDataBase;Trusted_Connection=True;

also if you are connecting with an sql server account, please check if you have set authentication mode of sql server to mixed mode.

and finally if your sql server is on a seperate machine, please be sure that there is no firewall or router is locking the communication of iis and sql server.

if these won't help you to solve the problem, please give us some details like
- your connectionstring
- is your sql server is on another computer
- configuration details of your sql server (like active net libraries, authentication details)

|||hi kadir,

thank-you for the quick reply. i will check all your suggestions and report back.

in the meantime, sql and webserver are all on the same server and the connection string is:-

databaseServer = "PROVIDER=SQLOLEDB;DATA SOURCE=pretty.ucc.usyd.edu.au;UID=xxx;PWD=xxx;DATABASE=xxx"|||hi kadir,

i must confess i'm not an sql server expert.

1. latest service pack and mdac were already installed.

2. allow remote connections is enabled. i couldn't see where (see point 3) using tcp/ip was. i'm using the ms sql management studioto find this information.

3. using sql server configuration manager i could find the following.

sql server 2005 network config - protocols for msqlserver
shared memory enabled
named pipes disabled
tcp/ip enabled
via disabled

sql native client config - client protocols
shared memory enabled
tcp/ip enabled
names pipes enabled
via disabled

4. we are connecting using an sql account. however, i couldn't see the option to allow mixed. i could only choose between windows authentication and sql server authentication.

thanks|||ok, just found the sql server surface area configuration. will check and report back.
|||remote connections is set to "local and remote connections" and using tcp/ip only.|||sql server and windows authentication mode were selected. so it looks like everything was configured they way you wanted.|||

Hi peter, sorry for the delay,

sql server and iis is on same machine so can you please test the following connectionstrings:
Provider=SQLNCLI;Server=(local);Database=xxx;Uid=xxx;Pwd=xxx
or
Provider=SQLNCLI;Server=127.0.0.1;Database=xxx;Uid=xxx;Pwd=xxx

and please inform me about the result.